QQQN vs. NUMG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while NUMG tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.

Performance

QQQN vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NUMG

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.21%
• 6M: -3.40%
• YTD: -3.12%
• 1Y: -4.37%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: -0.96%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	8.80%

QQQN vs. NUMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQN	NUMG
Technology	47.3%	32.4%
Healthcare	19.9%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	15.1%
Industrials	8.7%	19.2%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.2%
Utilities	1.6%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.9%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NUMG

NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 8
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQN vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQN	NUMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.98	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.55	—

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and NUMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	NUMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-38.85%	+38.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-11.82%	+11.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-11.37%	+11.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	NUMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.81%	-18.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	22.96%	-22.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	21.82%	-21.82%

QQQN vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQN vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.06%	0.18%	0.18%	12.76%	3.82%	0.27%	5.14%	0.56%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or NUMG?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or NUMG?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or NUMG?

NUMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQN and NUMG?

QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.30% for NUMG.