PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. SHYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQM vs. SHYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than SHYG's 1.32% return.


QQQM

1D
1.54%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.72%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*

SHYG

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. SHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
16.72%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.32%7.94%8.17%10.38%-4.71%4.60%3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and SHYG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.66

The correlation between QQQM and SHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. SHYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQM
SHYG

Technology

53.8%

-

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%
99.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%
0.7%

Technology

QQQM
53.8%
SHYG

-

Communication Services

QQQM
15.8%
SHYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQM
12.3%
SHYG

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQM
7.7%
SHYG

-

Healthcare

QQQM
4.2%
SHYG

-

Industrials

QQQM
2.8%
SHYG

-

Utilities

QQQM
1.4%
SHYG
99.3%

Basic Materials

QQQM
1.1%
SHYG

-

Energy

QQQM
0.6%
SHYG

-

Financial Services

QQQM
0.2%
SHYG

-

Real Estate

QQQM
0.1%
SHYG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. SHYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYG
SHYG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. SHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQMSHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.67

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

15.93

-4.49

QQQM vs. SHYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the SHYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and SHYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQMSHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.02

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.84

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. SHYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than SHYG's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and SHYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMSHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-19.26%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-1.75%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-4.53%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-9.39%

-25.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-0.36%

-3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-1.44%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

0.40%

+2.74%

Volatility

QQQM vs. SHYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (SHYG) at 0.92%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQMSHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

0.92%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

2.53%

+10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

3.18%

+13.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

5.73%

+16.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

6.42%

+15.78%

QQQM vs. SHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQM vs. SHYG - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than SHYG's 7.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.43%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG
iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.03%7.03%6.93%6.54%5.57%4.83%5.07%5.33%5.90%5.49%5.53%5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQM and SHYG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to SHYG (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs SHYG's -19.26%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.06% vs 4.77% for SHYG. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.06% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SHYG.

SHYG has the higher dividend yield at 7.03%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHYG is High Yield Bonds. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SHYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.30% for SHYG.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and SHYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer