PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQM vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.


QQQM

1D
1.54%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.72%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.86%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
16.72%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%148.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and PLTR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.58

The correlation between QQQM and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQMPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.18

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

0.33

+11.11

QQQM vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQMPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

0.14

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.64

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.86

-0.06

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-84.62%

+49.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-38.19%

+26.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-40.61%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-79.14%

+44.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-34.13%

+30.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-40.29%

+32.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

20.71%

-17.57%

Volatility

QQQM vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 6.83%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQMPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

17.24%

-10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

38.35%

-25.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

50.93%

-34.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

65.44%

-43.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

69.81%

-47.61%

Dividends

QQQM vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.43%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQM and PLTR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to QQQM (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer