QQQM vs. MSFT
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 14.77%/yr vs 8.30%/yr for MSFT. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QQQM vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -16.45% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 24.66%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.84%
MSFT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.73%
QQQM vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 13.60% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.45% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and MSFT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQM and MSFT has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
MSFT
QQQM vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQM | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.88 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.60 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | -1.10 | +8.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -69.38% | +34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -34.50% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -34.50% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -37.15% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -25.32% | +18.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -21.80% | +13.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 18.74% | -15.32% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 7.27%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 10.25% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 24.51% | -9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 27.52% | -8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 27.07% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 27.15% | -4.85% |
Dividends
QQQM vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than MSFT's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and MSFT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to QQQM (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer