QQQM vs. CNDX.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS).
QQQM and CNDX.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. CNDX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both QQQM and CNDX.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.75% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -5.21% | 20.42% | 26.92% | 55.16% | -34.12% | 29.34% | 5.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
QQQM is traded in USD, while CNDX.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CNDX.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.AS's -5.21% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- 24.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 18.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
CNDX.AS
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQM | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 1.81 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.22 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 12.60 | -5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQM | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.90 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and CNDX.AS is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.AS drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and CNDX.AS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -31.21% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -13.20% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -31.21% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -7.63% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -5.49% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.33% | +0.11% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) at 5.59%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 5.59% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 11.78% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.45% | 20.21% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.56% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 19.84% | +2.42% |