QQQM vs. AVDV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. QQQM is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 16.94%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for AVDV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.

Performance

QQQM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 14.99% return.

QQQM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 17.91%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: —

AVDV

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 14.99%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 40.93%
• 3Y*: 26.72%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.59%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	14.99%	49.37%	8.67%	16.85%	-11.47%	15.80%	16.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and AVDV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.58

The correlation between QQQM and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQM	AVDV
Technology	53.8%	6.4%
Communication Services	15.8%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	3.4%
Healthcare	4.2%	2.1%
Industrials	2.8%	21.3%
Utilities	1.4%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.1%	22.5%
Energy	0.6%	10.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	13.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AVDV

AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQM	AVDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.53	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.36	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.46	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	3.12	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	12.44	-1.21

QQQM vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and AVDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQM	AVDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.04%	-43.01%	+7.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-13.19%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-14.17%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.04%	-28.08%	-6.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-2.24%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-6.76%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	3.30%	-0.09%

Volatility

QQQM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 6.26%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQM	AVDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	6.26%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.71%	13.88%	-0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	16.25%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.40%	17.41%	+4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	19.77%	+2.45%

QQQM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than AVDV's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	4.11%	3.05%	4.31%	3.29%	3.17%	2.39%	1.67%	0.36%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.43%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQM and AVDV in my portfolio?

QQQM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQM or AVDV?

QQQM has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to AVDV (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

Which ETF is better, QQQM or AVDV?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.94% vs 13.63% for AVDV. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQM or AVDV?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQM or AVDV?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQM or AVDV?

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between QQQM and AVDV?

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.36% for AVDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.