PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
-0.15%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%1.27%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
10.26%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%24.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 10.26% return.


QQQJ

1D
1.46%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
2.36%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
10.26%
6M
20.31%
1Y
83.12%
3Y*
35.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJSOXQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.08

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

2.68

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.79

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.43

17.49

-9.07

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and SOXQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJSOXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.08

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.60

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and SOXQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SOXQ's 0.46% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.88%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.46%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and SOXQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-46.01%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-17.44%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-7.78%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-13.37%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

4.78%

-1.48%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 8.53%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 12.69%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQJSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

12.69%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

26.33%

-11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

40.14%

-17.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

36.10%

-14.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

36.10%

-13.99%