QQQJ vs. SOXQ
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQJ returned 22.59%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- 1Y
- 47.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 23.83% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 1.27% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and SOXQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QQQJ and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQJ
SOXQ
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
QQQJ
SOXQ
Healthcare
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Industrials
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Energy
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Utilities
QQQJ
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
QQQJ
SOXQ
Real Estate
QQQJ
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
SOXQ
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.69 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 11.08 | -7.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 42.47 | -25.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 5.11 | -2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.96 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -46.01% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -15.59% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -39.36% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -2.15% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -12.95% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 4.06% | -1.32% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 5.59%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 13.55% | -7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 26.81% | -12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 33.80% | -15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 36.38% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 36.38% | -14.33% |
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.71% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to QQQJ (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 22.59% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 22.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer