PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. RYOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than RYOCX's 10.92% return.


QQQJ

1D
0.02%
1M
-3.19%
6M
15.30%
YTD
19.53%
1Y
34.13%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.75%

RYOCX

1D
3.36%
1M
-4.24%
6M
9.68%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
19.18%
ALL TIME*
14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.82M$6.21M$6.07M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
19.53%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.34%
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
10.92%19.51%24.34%53.31%-33.34%25.85%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and RYOCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.81

The correlation between QQQJ and RYOCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. RYOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RYOCX
RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQJRYOCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.61

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

5.15

+5.87

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the RYOCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and RYOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum RYOCX drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and RYOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJRYOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-83.75%

+44.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-12.31%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-22.97%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-38.04%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.66%

-8.44%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-31.74%

+16.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.84%

-0.84%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 3.49%, while Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJRYOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

6.87%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

15.99%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.15%

19.37%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.14%

23.27%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

22.82%

-0.86%

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RYOCX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. RYOCX - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than RYOCX's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.56%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
3.86%4.28%7.23%0.00%8.82%4.47%4.17%3.80%1.86%6.00%1.75%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and RYOCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYOCX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to QQQJ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs RYOCX's -83.75%.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and RYOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer