PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQI vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQI vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-3.32%18.62%19.83%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
2.35%17.40%13.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 2.35% return.


QQQI

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVO

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
2.35%
6M
5.61%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQI vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQIDIVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.94

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.96

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.37

9.17

-0.80

QQQI vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and DIVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQIDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.83

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and DIVO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQI vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than DIVO's 6.47% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.88%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.47%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and DIVO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-30.04%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-6.35%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-3.81%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-2.62%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.97%

+0.60%

Volatility

QQQI vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 3.57%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQIDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

3.57%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

7.01%

+4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

13.13%

+6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

11.92%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

14.92%

+2.55%