QQQH vs. QNDX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQQH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for QNDX.

Performance

QQQH vs. QNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQH

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 6.00%
• YTD: 7.03%
• 1Y: 15.06%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —

QNDX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. QNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	1.36%
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and QNDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.99

Return for Risk

QQQH vs. QNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 52
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. QNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQH	QNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	—	—

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. QNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than QNDX's maximum drawdown of -3.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and QNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQH	QNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.24%	-3.65%	-27.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-2.25%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-1.71%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQH	QNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.02%	22.98%	-11.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	22.98%	-9.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.45%	22.98%	-9.53%

QQQH vs. QNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QNDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQH vs. QNDX - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, while QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	8.89%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQH and QNDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QQQH and QNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QQQH or QNDX?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQH or QNDX?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQH or QNDX?

QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.89%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QQQH and QNDX?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 0.10% for QNDX.