PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. KHPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQH vs. KHPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQH vs. KHPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-3.47%14.17%9.19%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
-3.49%11.14%4.29%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQH having a -3.47% return and KHPI slightly lower at -3.49%.


QQQH

1D
2.16%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*

KHPI

1D
1.47%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-0.79%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQH vs. KHPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than KHPI's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQH vs. KHPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

KHPI
KHPI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
KHPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
KHPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHPI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. KHPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQHKHPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.97

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.46

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.64

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.97

7.34

+0.63

QQQH vs. KHPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the KHPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and KHPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQHKHPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.97

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.76

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and KHPI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQH vs. KHPI - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, which matches KHPI's 9.44% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
9.48%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%
KHPI
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
9.44%8.90%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. KHPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than KHPI's maximum drawdown of -10.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and KHPI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQHKHPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.24%

-10.58%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-6.55%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-5.18%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-1.27%

-7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.46%

+0.42%

Volatility

QQQH vs. KHPI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) at 3.18%. This indicates that QQQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQHKHPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.18%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

5.25%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

10.96%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

9.79%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

9.79%

+3.72%