PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. JDIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-2.89%14.17%25.98%30.96%-28.35%9.76%18.62%0.31%
JDIEX
Easterly Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%11.87%17.36%14.58%-2.74%11.25%7.57%0.18%

Returns By Period


QQQH

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-1.20%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*

JDIEX

1D
2.04%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.42%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
8.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQH vs. JDIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than JDIEX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQH vs. JDIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

JDIEX
JDIEX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JDIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQHJDIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.07

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

1.55

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.28

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

6.95

+1.35

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the JDIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and JDIEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQHJDIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.07

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.84

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.75

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and JDIEX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, while JDIEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
9.43%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JDIEX
Easterly Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.09%0.23%2.45%10.68%8.01%1.99%10.75%2.57%0.11%

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than JDIEX's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and JDIEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQHJDIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.24%

-17.63%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-9.80%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

-17.57%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-1.25%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-2.57%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.80%

+0.10%

Volatility

QQQH vs. JDIEX - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX) at 2.80%. This indicates that QQQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQHJDIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.80%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

4.92%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

11.42%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

11.27%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

10.72%

+2.79%