QQQH vs. CMBT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT).

QQQH is managed by Neos. It was launched on Dec 19, 2019.

Performance

QQQH vs. CMBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQH vs. CMBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	-3.47%	14.17%	25.98%	30.96%	-28.35%	9.76%	18.62%	0.31%
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	31.76%	-2.30%	-35.19%	17.73%	93.21%	12.61%	-24.34%	4.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than CMBT's 31.76% return.

QQQH

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: -1.45%
• 1Y: 15.06%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: —

CMBT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -14.58%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 36.14%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: -0.16%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QQQH vs. CMBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 69
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CMBT

CMBT Risk / Return Rank: 72
CMBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CMBT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMBT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. CMBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQH	CMBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	0.96	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.56	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.18	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.01	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	4.93	+3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQH vs. CMBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the CMBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and CMBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQH	CMBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	0.96	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.31	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.18	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and CMBT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQQH vs. CMBT - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than CMBT's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	9.48%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	0.79%	0.52%	25.18%	12.23%	0.70%	1.35%	20.75%	0.96%	1.73%	3.03%	17.23%	6.35%

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. CMBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, smaller than the maximum CMBT drawdown of -57.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and CMBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQH	CMBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.24%	-57.21%	+25.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-19.70%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	-57.21%	+25.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-30.41%	+25.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.49%	-25.31%	+16.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	8.02%	-6.14%

Volatility

QQQH vs. CMBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 4.48%, while Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQH	CMBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	12.29%	-7.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	27.91%	-19.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.73%	42.87%	-28.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	42.58%	-29.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.51%	40.86%	-27.35%