QQQG vs. WNTR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 34.56% vs 106.98% for WNTR. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

QQQG vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 7.92% return.

QQQG

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 32.20%
• YTD: 28.97%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.24%

WNTR

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: 5.36%
• 6M: 2.42%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 1Y: 106.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 44.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$354.95K	$397.77K	$489.74K
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.95M	$3.66M	$3.95M

QQQG vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	28.97%	19.72%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	7.92%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.44

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQG vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.97	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.27	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	2.52	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	6.38	+1.09

QQQG vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-42.65%	+19.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-42.65%	+28.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.78%	-11.95%	+6.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-20.12%	+16.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.64%	16.84%	-12.20%

Volatility

QQQG vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is 9.43%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 13.23%. This indicates that QQQG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	13.23%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.40%	46.95%	-25.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	54.62%	-29.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	53.31%	-28.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.10%	53.31%	-28.21%

QQQG vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than WNTR's 109.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	109.83%	58.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and WNTR in my portfolio?

QQQG and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to QQQG (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 106.98% vs 34.56% for QQQG. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QQQG has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 106.98% return vs 34.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or WNTR?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 109.83%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and WNTR?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.