QQQG vs. VITAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and VITAX (Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while VITAX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. QQQG is actively managed, while VITAX is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 38.51% vs 44.25% for VITAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VITAX.

Performance

QQQG vs. VITAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than VITAX's 23.34% return.

QQQG

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 27.35%
• 1Y: 38.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VITAX

• 1D: -3.70%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 23.34%
• 6M: 21.28%
• 1Y: 44.25%
• 3Y*: 30.11%
• 5Y*: 19.50%
• 10Y*: 25.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. VITAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	29.97%	14.72%	1.68%
VITAX Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares	23.34%	21.78%	7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and VITAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	0.88

The correlation between QQQG and VITAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQG vs. VITAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQG	VITAX
Technology	74.2%	98.5%
Healthcare	10.4%	0.0%
Communication Services	5.2%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	0.1%
Energy	2.3%	0.3%
Industrials	2.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. VITAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

VITAX

VITAX Risk / Return Rank: 51
VITAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VITAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VITAX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
VITAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VITAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. VITAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	VITAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.06	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.60	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.35	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	2.87	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	8.75	+1.06

QQQG vs. VITAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VITAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and VITAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. VITAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum VITAX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and VITAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	VITAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-54.81%	+31.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-16.38%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.04%	-7.72%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-8.01%	+4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	5.36%	-1.43%

Volatility

QQQG vs. VITAX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) have volatilities of 11.40% and 11.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	VITAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	11.40%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.71%	18.68%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.09%	22.82%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	25.76%	-1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	25.01%	-0.69%

QQQG vs. VITAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VITAX's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. VITAX - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than VITAX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VITAX Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.63%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and VITAX in my portfolio?

QQQG and VITAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or VITAX?

VITAX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to QQQG (11.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs VITAX's -54.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VITAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.