QQQG vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. QQQG is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 42.60% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

QQQG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 32.43% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

QQQG

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 17.75%
• YTD: 32.43%
• 6M: 30.01%
• 1Y: 42.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	32.43%	14.72%	2.23%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and OILK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.05

The correlation between QQQG and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQG vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQG	OILK
Technology	68.6%	-
Healthcare	12.1%	-
Communication Services	10.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	100.0%
Industrials	2.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Energy	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.06	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.59	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	3.42	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	6.91	+4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQG vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	2.06	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.12	+1.09

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-83.76%	+60.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-17.35%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.66%	+3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-32.61%	+29.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	8.56%	-4.73%

Volatility

QQQG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is 5.26%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QQQG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	10.44%	-5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.03%	23.26%	-7.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.65%	28.75%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.41%	30.12%	-6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.41%	35.97%	-12.56%

QQQG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.04%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and OILK in my portfolio?

QQQG and OILK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QQQG (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or OILK?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 42.60% for QQQG. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QQQG has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or OILK?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 42.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or OILK?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.04% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and OILK?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.