QQQG vs. FMTM

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 34.56% vs 47.28% for FMTM. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

QQQG vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly higher than FMTM's 24.65% return.

QQQG

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 32.20%
• YTD: 28.97%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.24%

FMTM

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 11.19%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 1Y: 47.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 40.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	$7.97M	$8.41M	$9.15M
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$354.95K	$397.77K	$489.74K

QQQG vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	28.97%	21.33%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	24.65%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and FMTM is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.75

The correlation between QQQG and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 69
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQG vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.78	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.30	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.08	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	10.54	-3.08

QQQG vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -15.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-15.40%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-15.40%	+1.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.78%	-8.20%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-2.46%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.64%	4.50%	+0.14%

Volatility

QQQG vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 9.43% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	9.36%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.40%	21.15%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.67%	26.73%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	24.82%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.10%	24.82%	+0.28%

QQQG vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FMTM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.24%	0.30%	0.00%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and FMTM in my portfolio?

QQQG and FMTM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or FMTM?

QQQG has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FMTM (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs FMTM's -15.40%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 47.28% vs 34.56% for QQQG. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 47.28% return vs 34.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or FMTM?

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and FMTM?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.