PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQG vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQG vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQG vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-6.74%14.72%2.23%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%2.33%-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 1.28% return.


QQQG

1D
3.98%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-6.74%
6M
-6.59%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.41%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQG vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQG vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG
QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQGCALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.95

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.99

6.03

-2.04

QQQG vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and CALF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQGCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.95

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.32

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and CALF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQG vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CALF's 1.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQG
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.06%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.43%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and CALF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQGCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-47.58%

+23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-16.47%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.36%

-6.40%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-10.92%

+7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.60%

+0.44%

Volatility

QQQG vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.25%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQGCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.25%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

11.14%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

22.66%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

23.68%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

26.18%

-2.56%