PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQE vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQE vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQE has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.61%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.29% annualized return.


QQQE

1D
1.18%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.14%
6M
16.29%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
15.61%

VONG

1D
0.10%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.46%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
18.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQE vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
17.14%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
2.96%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQE and VONG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012

0.89

The correlation between QQQE and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQE vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQE
VONG

Technology

51.0%
51.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
13.2%

Industrials

9.3%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.4%
13.2%

Healthcare

7.8%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
2.7%

Utilities

3.4%
0.3%

Energy

1.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.8%
5.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.4%

Technology

QQQE
51.0%
VONG
51.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQE
9.8%
VONG
13.2%

Industrials

QQQE
9.3%
VONG
5.7%

Communication Services

QQQE
8.4%
VONG
13.2%

Healthcare

QQQE
7.8%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

QQQE
7.0%
VONG
2.7%

Utilities

QQQE
3.4%
VONG
0.3%

Energy

QQQE
1.7%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

QQQE
0.8%
VONG
0.3%

Financial Services

QQQE
0.8%
VONG
5.3%

Real Estate

QQQE
0.7%
VONG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQE vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQE vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQEVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.17

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

3.87

+5.08

QQQE vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQE and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQE vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQEVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-32.72%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-16.23%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-23.27%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-32.72%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

-32.72%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-5.52%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.88%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

4.91%

-2.12%

Volatility

QQQE vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.30%. This indicates that QQQE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQEVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

5.30%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

12.35%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

15.87%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

21.39%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

20.91%

-0.12%

QQQE vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQE vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.53%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQE and VONG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQE has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to VONG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.29% vs 15.61% for QQQE. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.06% for VONG.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQE and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer