PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQE vs. ROE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQE vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 19.12% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.


QQQE

1D
-0.10%
1M
10.46%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.48%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
15.49%

ROE

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.10%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.56%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQE vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.12%14.58%6.98%5.88%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
20.98%17.20%18.34%4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQE and ROE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023

0.88

The correlation between QQQE and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQE vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQE
ROE

Technology

45.1%
36.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.4%

Industrials

10.1%
9.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.7%

Utilities

3.9%
1.9%

Energy

2.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

1.0%
11.7%

Basic Materials

0.9%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.9%

Technology

QQQE
45.1%
ROE
36.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQE
10.9%
ROE
9.4%

Industrials

QQQE
10.1%
ROE
9.8%

Communication Services

QQQE
9.1%
ROE
10.6%

Healthcare

QQQE
8.6%
ROE
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

QQQE
7.7%
ROE
4.7%

Utilities

QQQE
3.9%
ROE
1.9%

Energy

QQQE
2.0%
ROE
3.5%

Financial Services

QQQE
1.0%
ROE
11.7%

Basic Materials

QQQE
0.9%
ROE
1.8%

Real Estate

QQQE
0.7%
ROE
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQE vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQE vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQEROEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.41

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

19.92

-9.35

QQQE vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQE and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQEROEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.74

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.39

-0.62

Drawdowns

QQQE vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, which is greater than ROE's maximum drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and ROE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQEROEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-19.10%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.66%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.04%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-2.59%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

1.91%

+0.81%

Volatility

QQQE vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQEROEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.79%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

10.66%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

13.94%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

15.78%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

15.78%

+4.94%

QQQE vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQE vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ROE's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.94%0.97%1.18%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQE and ROE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to QQQE (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs ROE's -19.10%.

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 37.99% vs 28.68% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 37.99% return vs 28.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

ROE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.

QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ROE is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.49% for ROE.

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQE and ROE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer