PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQE vs. FDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQE vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQE achieves a 19.12% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 7.52% return.


QQQE

1D
-0.10%
1M
10.46%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.48%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
15.49%

FDG

1D
-2.00%
1M
3.68%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.17%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQE vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.12%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%67.53%
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
7.52%22.13%45.89%37.22%-35.74%8.52%93.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQE and FDG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020

0.88

The correlation between QQQE and FDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQE vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQE
FDG

Technology

45.1%
37.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
17.1%

Industrials

10.1%
5.2%

Communication Services

9.1%
21.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Utilities

3.9%
0.1%

Energy

2.0%
0.6%

Financial Services

1.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

QQQE
45.1%
FDG
37.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQE
10.9%
FDG
17.1%

Industrials

QQQE
10.1%
FDG
5.2%

Communication Services

QQQE
9.1%
FDG
21.5%

Healthcare

QQQE
8.6%
FDG
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQQE
7.7%
FDG

-

Utilities

QQQE
3.9%
FDG
0.1%

Energy

QQQE
2.0%
FDG
0.6%

Financial Services

QQQE
1.0%
FDG
4.7%

Basic Materials

QQQE
0.9%
FDG

-

Real Estate

QQQE
0.7%
FDG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQE vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQE vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQEFDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.99

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.57

7.02

+3.55

QQQE vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQE and FDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQEFDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.76

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.51

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.92

-0.15

Drawdowns

QQQE vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQE drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQE and FDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQEFDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-43.69%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-15.71%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

-26.14%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-43.69%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-3.13%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-13.43%

+8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

4.45%

-1.73%

Volatility

QQQE vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) is 3.79%, while American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that QQQE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQEFDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

5.18%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

14.03%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

17.77%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

24.67%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

24.90%

-4.18%

QQQE vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQE vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

QQQE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQE and FDG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to QQQE (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQE dropped -32.14% vs FDG's -43.69%.

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 12.61% vs 10.30% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

QQQE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDG is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QQQE and 0.45% for FDG.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQE and FDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer