QQQD vs. SH
QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds - QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%) while SH tracks the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQD returned -21.80% vs -17.23% for SH. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
QQQD vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.00% return.
QQQD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -2.89%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -21.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
QQQD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -2.89% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQD and SH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between QQQD and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
QQQD
SH
QQQD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | -1.47 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | -2.10 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.77 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.95 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -1.75 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | -1.47 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.59 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
QQQD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -49.47%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.47% | -94.66% | +45.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | -18.28% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.50% | -94.62% | +47.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -67.73% | +37.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.72% | 9.89% | +7.83% |
Volatility
QQQD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQD | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 2.84% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 8.91% | +5.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.21% | 11.80% | +8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 16.85% | +9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 18.01% | +8.76% |
QQQD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than SH's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.07% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQD and SH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQD has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQD dropped -49.47% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -17.23% vs -21.80% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.07% for QQQD.
QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%), while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QQQD and 0.90% for SH.
QQQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.08 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQD and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer