QQQD vs. EMTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY).
QQQD and EMTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQD is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). It was launched on Mar 6, 2024. EMTY is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). It was launched on Nov 14, 2017. Both QQQD and EMTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQQD vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQD vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 14.23% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | -2.09% | -1.76% | 1.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQD achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than EMTY's -2.09% return.
QQQD
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- -23.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTY
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- -10.96%
- 3Y*
- -1.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQD vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQD vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
QQQD
EMTY
QQQD vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | -0.54 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | -0.62 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.46 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | -0.61 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | -0.54 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | -0.45 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQD and EMTY is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QQQD vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
QQQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than EMTY's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.46% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.56% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
QQQD vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQD drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, smaller than the maximum EMTY drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQD and EMTY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -77.62% | +29.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.27% | -25.41% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.24% | -75.56% | +37.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.01% | -53.57% | +24.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.41% | 19.03% | +14.38% |
Volatility
QQQD vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) at 4.16%. This indicates that QQQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQD | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 4.16% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.43% | 12.19% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.47% | 20.26% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 22.40% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 25.76% | +1.57% |