PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than UPRO's 27.90% return.


QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*

UPRO

1D
-2.09%
1M
14.64%
YTD
27.90%
6M
26.67%
1Y
80.84%
3Y*
52.58%
5Y*
23.13%
10Y*
30.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
27.90%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%48.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and UPRO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.83

The correlation between QQQA and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQA vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQA
UPRO

Technology

65.2%
17.8%

Communication Services

13.7%
4.8%

Energy

9.1%
1.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

28.8%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

QQQA
65.2%
UPRO
17.8%

Communication Services

QQQA
13.7%
UPRO
4.8%

Energy

QQQA
9.1%
UPRO
1.4%

Healthcare

QQQA
7.8%
UPRO
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQA
4.2%
UPRO
4.5%

Basic Materials

QQQA

-

UPRO
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

QQQA

-

UPRO
2.0%

Financial Services

QQQA

-

UPRO
28.8%

Industrials

QQQA

-

UPRO
3.4%

Real Estate

QQQA

-

UPRO
0.8%

Utilities

QQQA

-

UPRO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQAUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.11

3.03

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.85

12.80

+10.04

QQQA vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQAUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

2.30

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.46

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-76.82%

+38.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-26.78%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-48.87%

+18.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-63.94%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.09%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-14.42%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

6.33%

-2.45%

Volatility

QQQA vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 8.45%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQAUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

8.45%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

26.60%

-4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

35.35%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

50.32%

-24.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

53.74%

-27.97%

QQQA vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQA vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than UPRO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.68%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and UPRO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to UPRO (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 5-year performance, UPRO leads with 23.13% vs 14.74% for QQQA. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 23.13% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.89% for UPRO.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer