QQQ vs. VAW
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 22.48%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for VAW. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VAW.
Performance
QQQ vs. VAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly higher than VAW's 13.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed VAW with an annualized return of 22.48%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
VAW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
QQQ vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.13% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and VAW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and VAW has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQQ vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
VAW
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
VAW
Communication Services
QQQ
VAW
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
VAW
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
VAW
Healthcare
QQQ
VAW
Industrials
QQQ
VAW
Utilities
QQQ
VAW
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
VAW
Energy
QQQ
VAW
Financial Services
QQQ
VAW
-
Real Estate
QQQ
VAW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
VAW
QQQ vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.84 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 5.85 | +6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than VAW's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and VAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -62.17% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -13.42% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -23.21% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -25.50% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -41.13% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -3.82% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -9.62% | -23.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 4.22% | -1.01% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) at 6.50%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 6.50% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.20% | 14.73% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.67% | 18.44% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 19.70% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 21.27% | +1.16% |
QQQ vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VAW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VAW's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and VAW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to VAW (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs VAW's -62.17%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VAW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VAW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
VAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VAW is Materials. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.09% for VAW.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and VAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer