QQQ vs. SEEGX
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SEEGX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund) are both funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SEEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. QQQ is passively managed, while SEEGX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 20.72%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for SEEGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SEEGX.
Performance
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 20.72%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.78% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- 20.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
SEEGX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 18.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 13.58% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | -0.04% | 14.08% | 35.14% | 34.62% | -25.40% | 18.17% | 56.02% | 39.13% | 0.50% | 38.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SEEGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QQQ and SEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SEEGX
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.07 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.36 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 0.99 | +6.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SEEGX's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SEEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -62.09% | -20.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -16.82% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -21.50% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -31.23% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -31.85% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -7.31% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.65% | -16.85% | -15.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 6.05% | -2.63% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.41%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 8.17% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 14.43% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 18.13% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 20.62% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 21.75% | +0.70% |
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SEEGX's 11.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund | 11.45% | 11.44% | 2.00% | 0.12% | 3.42% | 14.92% | 5.27% | 12.85% | 15.97% | 14.79% | 9.88% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QQQ and SEEGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SEEGX has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to QQQ (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SEEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer