QQQ vs. OUNZ
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while OUNZ is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for OUNZ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OUNZ.
Performance
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than OUNZ's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed OUNZ with an annualized return of 21.59%, while OUNZ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
OUNZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 30.33%
- 3Y*
- 29.90%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.29% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and OUNZ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2014 | 0.02 |
The correlation between QQQ and OUNZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
OUNZ
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Communication Services
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Healthcare
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Industrials
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Utilities
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Energy
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Financial Services
QQQ
OUNZ
-
Real Estate
QQQ
OUNZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
OUNZ
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.52 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 3.82 | +7.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.14 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.99 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.79 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.64 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and OUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -21.77% | -61.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -20.00% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -20.00% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -21.01% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -21.76% | -13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -19.83% | +15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -7.58% | -25.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 7.96% | -4.82% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) at 5.67%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 5.67% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 23.29% | -10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 26.66% | -9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 17.99% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 16.00% | +6.36% |
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and OUNZ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to OUNZ (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs OUNZ's -21.77%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 12.64% for OUNZ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OUNZ.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OUNZ is Precious Metals. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Merk. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.25% for OUNZ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and OUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer