QQQ vs. NVO
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for NVO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQQ vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 21.59%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
NVO
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- -16.56%
- 6M
- -9.23%
- 1Y
- -42.47%
- 3Y*
- -17.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
QQQ vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -16.56% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and NVO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
NVO
QQQ vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.86 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.77 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | -1.14 | +12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | -0.82 | +2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.05 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.19 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -74.70% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -55.03% | +43.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -74.70% | +51.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -74.70% | +39.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -74.70% | +39.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -70.19% | +66.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -17.77% | -15.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 37.21% | -34.07% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.84%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 9.75% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 38.30% | -25.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 52.08% | -35.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 38.31% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 32.56% | -10.20% |
Dividends
QQQ vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than NVO's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.39% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and NVO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs NVO's -74.70%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer