QQQ vs. FNMA
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while FNMA (Federal National Mortgage Association) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for FNMA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQQ vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than FNMA's -39.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed FNMA with an annualized return of 21.59%, while FNMA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
FNMA
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- -39.49%
- 6M
- -43.24%
- 1Y
- -28.49%
- 3Y*
- 143.22%
- 5Y*
- 22.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
QQQ vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | -39.49% | 227.13% | 206.54% | 202.77% | -56.90% | -65.69% | -23.40% | 194.34% | -60.00% | -32.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and FNMA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
FNMA
QQQ vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.01 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.41 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | -0.77 | +12.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | -0.31 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.24 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.13 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.07 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, smaller than the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and FNMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -99.74% | +16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -69.76% | +57.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -69.76% | +46.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -85.40% | +50.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -92.13% | +57.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -91.13% | +87.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -46.17% | +13.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 36.82% | -33.68% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.84%, while Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) has a volatility of 18.02%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | FNMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 18.02% | -11.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 66.17% | -52.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 93.62% | -76.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 91.94% | -69.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 81.94% | -59.58% |
Dividends
QQQ vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while FNMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and FNMA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNMA has higher volatility (18.02%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs FNMA's -99.74%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and FNMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer