PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. YMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than YMAX's 6.06% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-1.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAX

1D
-1.70%
1M
6.76%
YTD
6.06%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
1.94%4.19%-5.60%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
6.06%6.04%-5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and YMAX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVYMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.09

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.35

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

0.82

-1.34

QQLV vs. YMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the YMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and YMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVYMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

0.42

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.70

-0.68

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and YMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVYMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-26.13%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-26.13%

+18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-5.98%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-6.33%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

10.99%

-7.26%

Volatility

QQLV vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) is 2.66%, while YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that QQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVYMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

6.22%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

17.10%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

21.62%

-11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

22.97%

-10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

22.97%

-10.27%

QQLV vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQLV vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than YMAX's 72.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.06%1.84%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
72.94%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and YMAX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QQLV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs YMAX's -26.13%.

On 1-year performance, YMAX leads with 9.02% vs -1.95% for QQLV. On fees, QQLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QQLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YMAX has performed better with a 9.02% return vs -1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 2.06% for QQLV.

QQLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YMAX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and YMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer