PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return.


QQLV

1D
2.68%
1M
2.34%
6M
4.61%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.35%
6M
9.08%
YTD
11.25%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
6.57%4.19%-5.60%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%-3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and ITOT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.37

The correlation between QQLV and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQLVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.31

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.48

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

10.79

-9.75

QQLV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-55.20%

+45.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-8.90%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-6.94%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

2.04%

+1.75%

Volatility

QQLV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 3.31%. This indicates that QQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

3.31%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

10.15%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

12.85%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

17.46%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.98%

18.24%

-5.26%

QQLV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than ITOT's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.02%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQLV has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to ITOT (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 21.93% vs 3.94% for QQLV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 21.93% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.

QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.00% for ITOT.

QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer