PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.27% return.


QQLV

1D
2.68%
1M
2.34%
6M
4.61%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDMO

1D
-1.59%
1M
-2.15%
6M
5.42%
YTD
8.27%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
6.57%4.19%-5.60%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.27%42.17%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and IDMO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.29

The correlation between QQLV and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQLVIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.77

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

6.94

-5.90

QQLV vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-39.38%

+29.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-12.31%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.93%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-9.70%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.13%

+0.66%

Volatility

QQLV vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) is 5.35%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that QQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.93%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

16.86%

-8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

18.53%

-7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

18.14%

-5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.98%

17.89%

-4.91%

QQLV vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQLV and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than IDMO's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.69%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.02%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and IDMO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to QQLV (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 1-year performance, IDMO leads with 21.68% vs 3.94% for QQLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, QQLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 21.68% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQLV and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.02% for QQLV.

QQLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer