PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-1.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and AFOS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

AFOS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVAFOSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.52

QQLV vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

4.35

-4.33

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-11.52%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-0.29%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-1.37%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

Volatility

QQLV vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

20.19%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

20.19%

-7.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

20.19%

-7.49%

QQLV vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQLV vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and AFOS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer