PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. YMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than YMAX's 6.06% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAX

1D
-1.70%
1M
6.76%
YTD
6.06%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and YMAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.78

The correlation between QQHG and YMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHGYMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.82

0.42

+2.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

0.70

+3.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.09

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

0.35

+3.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.07

0.82

+16.25

QQHG vs. YMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the YMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and YMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGYMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

0.42

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

0.70

+2.66

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and YMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGYMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-26.13%

+19.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-26.13%

+19.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-5.98%

+5.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-6.33%

+5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

10.99%

-9.44%

Volatility

QQHG vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 2.12%, while YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGYMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

6.22%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

17.10%

-10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

21.62%

-12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

22.97%

-13.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

22.97%

-13.44%

QQHG vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than YMAX's 72.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.20%0.17%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
72.94%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQHG and YMAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs YMAX's -26.13%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 9.02% for YMAX. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while YMAX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 1.28% for YMAX.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and YMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer