QQHG vs. QGRD
QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQHG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QGRD.
Performance
QQHG vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than QGRD's 15.09% return.
QQHG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 11.43% | 10.05% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 15.09% | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQHG and QGRD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQHG vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank
QQHG
QGRD
QQHG vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQHG | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQHG | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.35 | 2.16 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
QQHG vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum QGRD drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and QGRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQHG | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -9.41% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.13% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -2.19% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | — | — |
Volatility
QQHG vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQHG | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 12.92% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 12.92% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.53% | 12.92% | -3.39% |
QQHG vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQHG vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison
QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than QGRD's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.36% | 1.57% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.20% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QQHG and QGRD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.
QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.85% for QGRD.
Find the right allocation for QQHG and QGRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer