PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 8.54% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PPA

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.54%
6M
13.46%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
11.43%20.59%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.54%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and PPA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHGPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.24

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

1.95

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

5.68

+11.39

QQHG vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.40

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

0.66

+2.69

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-57.37%

+51.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-13.71%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-8.40%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-9.18%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

4.69%

-3.14%

Volatility

QQHG vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 2.12%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

6.73%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

15.95%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

19.03%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

18.49%

-8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

20.64%

-11.11%

QQHG vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than PPA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.39%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.20%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQHG and PPA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 1-year performance, PPA leads with 26.57% vs 26.43% for QQHG. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PPA has performed better with a 26.57% return vs 26.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.58% for PPA.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer