QQHG vs. HECO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) and HECO (State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQHG is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Invesco, while HECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQHG returned 26.43% vs 136.32% for HECO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQHG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HECO.

Performance

QQHG vs. HECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than HECO's 71.77% return.

QQHG

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 11.43%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HECO

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 33.22%
• YTD: 71.77%
• 6M: 57.04%
• 1Y: 136.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. HECO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	11.43%	20.59%
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	71.77%	52.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and HECO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025	0.71

The correlation between QQHG and HECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQHG vs. HECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG

QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 84
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

HECO

HECO Risk / Return Rank: 89
HECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HECO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HECO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. HECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQHG	HECO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	3.68	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	4.07	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.51	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	6.52	-2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.07	18.71	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQHG vs. HECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the HECO Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and HECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQHG	HECO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	3.68	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.35	1.80	+1.56

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. HECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum HECO drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and HECO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQHG	HECO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-44.59%	+38.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-21.03%	+14.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-1.18%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-11.81%	+10.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	7.31%	-5.76%

Volatility

QQHG vs. HECO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is 2.12%, while State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (HECO) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that QQHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQHG	HECO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	10.30%	-8.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.66%	29.36%	-22.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.47%	37.32%	-27.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	44.93%	-35.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.53%	44.93%	-35.40%

QQHG vs. HECO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HECO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQHG vs. HECO - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while HECO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HECO State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.61%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.20%	0.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQHG and HECO in my portfolio?

QQHG and HECO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQHG or HECO?

HECO has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs HECO's -44.59%.

Which ETF is better, QQHG or HECO?

On 1-year performance, HECO leads with 136.32% vs 26.43% for QQHG. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQHG or HECO?

Over the 1-year period, HECO has performed better with a 136.32% return vs 26.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQHG or HECO?

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for HECO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQHG or HECO?

QQHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for HECO.

What is the main difference between QQHG and HECO?

QQHG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while HECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.90% for HECO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.