PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


QQEW

1D
0.22%
1M
1.83%
YTD
7.88%
6M
6.21%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
14.72%

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and WNTR is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQEWWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.29

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

5.85

-3.21

QQEW vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-42.65%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-42.65%

+26.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-9.88%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-20.93%

+12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.26%

16.70%

-11.44%

Volatility

QQEW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) is 8.81%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that QQEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

17.54%

-8.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.28%

45.99%

-30.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

52.83%

-34.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

53.10%

-32.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

53.10%

-32.18%

QQEW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.29%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
96.66%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to QQEW (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 13.84% for QQEW. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQEW has been the lower-risk option at 8.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 0.29% for QQEW.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer