PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


QQEW

1D
-0.78%
1M
14.51%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.58%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
14.57%

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
12.15%14.22%7.00%33.31%-24.59%17.75%37.30%35.87%-5.30%26.04%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.13

The correlation between QQEW and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQEW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQEW
OILK

Technology

55.9%

-

Healthcare

14.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Industrials

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQEW
55.9%
OILK

-

Healthcare

QQEW
14.7%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQEW
12.2%
OILK
100.0%

Communication Services

QQEW
10.3%
OILK

-

Industrials

QQEW
3.3%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

QQEW
2.0%
OILK

-

Real Estate

QQEW
1.6%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

QQEW

-

OILK

-

Energy

QQEW

-

OILK

-

Financial Services

QQEW

-

OILK

-

Utilities

QQEW

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQEWOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.42

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

6.91

-2.82

QQEW vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQEWOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.06

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.59

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.12

+0.42

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-83.76%

+25.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-17.35%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-23.42%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-34.69%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-3.66%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-32.61%

+24.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

8.56%

-3.43%

Volatility

QQEW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) is 5.54%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QQEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

10.44%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

23.26%

-9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

28.75%

-11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

30.12%

-9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

35.97%

-15.10%

QQEW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.28%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QQEW (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 8.78% for QQEW. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQEW has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.28% for QQEW.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer