QQEW vs. OILK
QQEW (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQEW returned 8.78%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQEW charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
QQEW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
QQEW
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QQEW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund | 12.15% | 14.22% | 7.00% | 33.31% | -24.59% | 17.75% | 37.30% | 35.87% | -5.30% | 26.04% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQEW and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between QQEW and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQEW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQEW
OILK
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QQEW
OILK
-
Healthcare
QQEW
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQEW
OILK
Communication Services
QQEW
OILK
-
Industrials
QQEW
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
QQEW
OILK
-
Real Estate
QQEW
OILK
-
Basic Materials
QQEW
-
OILK
-
Energy
QQEW
-
OILK
-
Financial Services
QQEW
-
OILK
-
Utilities
QQEW
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQEW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
QQEW
OILK
QQEW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQEW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.42 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 6.91 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQEW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.06 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.12 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
QQEW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQEW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.16% | -83.76% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.74% | -17.35% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.43% | -23.42% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.12% | -34.69% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -3.66% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -32.61% | +24.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 8.56% | -3.43% |
Volatility
QQEW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) is 5.54%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QQEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQEW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 10.44% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 23.26% | -9.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 28.75% | -11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 30.12% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 35.97% | -15.10% |
QQEW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQEW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQEW First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.57% | 0.70% | 0.66% | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQEW and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QQEW (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 8.78% for QQEW. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQEW has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.28% for QQEW.
QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQEW and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer