QQDN vs. YXI
QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - QQDN is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while YXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQDN returned -34.59% vs 8.97% for YXI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QQDN vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 14.35% return.
QQDN
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- -9.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.51%
- 10Y*
- -7.21%
QQDN vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | -11.94% | -34.51% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 14.35% | -3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQDN and YXI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQDN vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
QQDN
YXI
QQDN vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQDN | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 0.77 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 1.50 | -2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQDN vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum YXI drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQDN | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.19% | -81.15% | +30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.68% | -12.04% | -31.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.46% | -76.65% | +33.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -54.43% | +23.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.15% | 6.14% | +19.01% |
Volatility
QQDN vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.42%. This indicates that QQDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQDN | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.19% | 7.42% | +6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.46% | 15.74% | +15.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.32% | 20.61% | +19.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 31.46% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 27.44% | +12.38% |
QQDN vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQDN and YXI have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QQDN vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than YXI's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | 5.59% | 3.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.49% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQDN and YXI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQDN has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to YXI (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQDN dropped -50.19% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 1-year performance, YXI leads with 8.97% vs -34.59% for QQDN. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YXI has performed better with a 8.97% return vs -34.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQDN and YXI have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 2.49% for YXI.
QQDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YXI is China Equities. QQDN tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%).
YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQDN and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer