QQDN vs. TSDD
QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. QQDN is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQDN charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
QQDN vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -17.46% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -1.81% return.
QQDN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -17.46%
- 6M
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -16.78%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- -64.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQDN vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | -17.46% | -34.14% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -1.81% | -63.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQDN and TSDD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQDN vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
QQDN
TSDD
QQDN vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | -0.66 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
QQDN vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.19% | -99.03% | +48.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.00% | -98.88% | +51.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -71.25% | +41.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.05% | — |
Volatility
QQDN vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.51% | 92.61% | -54.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 114.39% | -75.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 114.39% | -75.88% |
QQDN vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQDN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQDN vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than TSDD's 8.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | 4.93% | 3.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.58% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQDN and TSDD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQDN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQDN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.58%, compared with 4.93% for QQDN.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQDN and 1.50% for TSDD.
Find the right allocation for QQDN and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer