QQDN vs. SSO
QQDN (ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - QQDN is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. QQDN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
QQDN vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQDN achieves a -17.46% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 20.20% return.
QQDN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -17.46%
- 6M
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 53.91%
- 3Y*
- 38.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
QQDN vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | -17.46% | -34.14% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 20.20% | 24.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQDN and SSO is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQDN vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
QQDN
SSO
QQDN vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega (QQDN) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQDN | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.21 | 0.42 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
QQDN vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQDN drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQDN and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQDN | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.19% | -84.67% | +34.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.00% | -0.71% | -46.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -19.57% | -10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
QQDN vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQDN | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.51% | 23.59% | +14.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 33.64% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.51% | 35.89% | +2.62% |
QQDN vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQDN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQDN vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
QQDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQDN ProShares UltraShort QQQ Mega | 4.93% | 3.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQDN and SSO have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQDN.
QQDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.
QQDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. QQDN tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQDN and 0.87% for SSO.
Find the right allocation for QQDN and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer