PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCL.TO achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than ENCL.TO's 36.58% return.


QQCL.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
12.39%
YTD
20.85%
6M
17.94%
1Y
43.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENCL.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
2.89%
YTD
36.58%
6M
32.07%
1Y
52.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
20.85%13.10%41.38%5.48%
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
36.58%14.97%20.32%-3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023

0.06

The correlation between QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQCL.TO
ENCL.TO

Technology

50.0%

-

Communication Services

16.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Industrials

3.4%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Energy

0.6%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQCL.TO
50.0%
ENCL.TO

-

Communication Services

QQCL.TO
16.4%
ENCL.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQCL.TO
12.5%
ENCL.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

QQCL.TO
8.6%
ENCL.TO

-

Healthcare

QQCL.TO
5.3%
ENCL.TO

-

Industrials

QQCL.TO
3.4%
ENCL.TO

-

Utilities

QQCL.TO
1.6%
ENCL.TO

-

Basic Materials

QQCL.TO
1.3%
ENCL.TO

-

Energy

QQCL.TO
0.6%
ENCL.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

QQCL.TO
0.2%
ENCL.TO

-

Real Estate

QQCL.TO
0.1%
ENCL.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCL.TO
QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCL.TO
ENCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQCL.TOENCL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

4.91

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

17.58

-2.09

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the ENCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQCL.TOENCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.98

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.27

+0.25

Drawdowns

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.63%, which is greater than ENCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQCL.TOENCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.63%

-21.05%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-10.75%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.54%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.95%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.00%

-0.15%

Volatility

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) is 4.30%, while Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD (ENCL.TO) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that QQCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQCL.TOENCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

7.30%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

15.75%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

17.75%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

20.15%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.38%

20.15%

+0.23%

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCL.TO's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQCL.TO vs. ENCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%, less than ENCL.TO's 13.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ENCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF CAD
13.35%17.14%18.56%4.68%
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
13.15%14.54%11.87%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQCL.TO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

QQCL.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ENCL.TO is Oil & Gas. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QQCL.TO and 1.86% for ENCL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQCL.TO and ENCL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer