QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO
QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) and CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI, while CIAI.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQCI.TO returned 24.09% vs 31.56% for CIAI.TO. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQCI.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CIAI.TO.
Performance
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCI.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than CIAI.TO's 19.72% return.
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.32%
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.13M | CA$1.20M | CA$2.71M | |
| CA$141.03K | CA$115.67K | CA$152.23K |
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 11.99% | 12.64% | 11.81% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.72% | 18.84% | 21.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCI.TO and CIAI.TO is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QQCI.TO and CIAI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCI.TO
CIAI.TO
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQCI.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.44 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 3.79 | +4.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCI.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum CIAI.TO drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCI.TO and CIAI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCI.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.95% | -31.22% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -18.93% | +10.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -9.81% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -6.50% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 7.20% | -4.64% |
Volatility
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) is 4.91%, while CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that QQCI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIAI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQCI.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 10.77% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 23.36% | -11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 28.32% | -13.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 29.48% | -13.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 29.48% | -13.56% |
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQCI.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CIAI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQCI.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, while CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQCI.TO and CIAI.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
QQCI.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CIAI.TO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for QQCI.TO and 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQCI.TO and CIAI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer