QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Invesco and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQC-F.TO returned 38.43% vs 57.03% for QQQL.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQC-F.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQL.TO.

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than QQQL.TO's 28.52% return.

QQC-F.TO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 10.71%
• YTD: 19.79%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 38.43%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 16.33%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

QQQL.TO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 16.49%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.33%
• 1Y: 57.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	19.79%	18.41%	12.06%
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF	28.52%	16.16%	24.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024	0.57

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO

QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

QQQL.TO

QQQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QQQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QQQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
QQQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QQQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQC-F.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	3.04	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	4.01	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.69	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	4.52	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.91	11.91	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQC-F.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	3.04	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.39	-0.46

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than QQQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQC-F.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.03%	-27.82%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-12.69%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-4.88%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	4.80%	-1.27%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) is 4.49%, while Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQC-F.TO	QQQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	5.60%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	13.85%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.89%	18.89%	-3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.45%	25.71%	-3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.54%	25.71%	-3.17%

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQC-F.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQL.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQC-F.TO nor QQQL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged	0.00%	0.09%	0.50%	0.57%	0.89%	0.66%	0.49%	0.64%	0.77%	0.66%	0.81%	0.76%
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO in my portfolio?

QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQC-F.TO or QQQL.TO?

On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQC-F.TO or QQQL.TO?

QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQL.TO.

What is the main difference between QQC-F.TO and QQQL.TO?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQC-F.TO and 0.49% for QQQL.TO.