PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
-6.40%16.16%24.06%
HXQ.TO
Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF
-4.70%15.05%18.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQL.TO achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's -4.70% return.


QQQL.TO

1D
-1.82%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-4.71%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HXQ.TO

1D
3.40%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-4.70%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQL.TO has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQL.TO
QQQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQL.TOHXQ.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.53

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

4.58

-0.78

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQL.TO and HXQ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQL.TOHXQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.95

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between QQQL.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQL.TO nor HXQ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum HXQ.TO drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQL.TO and HXQ.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQL.TOHXQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-31.60%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-12.97%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-9.45%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-5.82%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

4.33%

+0.64%

Volatility

QQQL.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) is 4.66%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that QQQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQL.TOHXQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

6.41%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

12.59%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

22.47%

+4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

20.78%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

20.85%

+4.97%