PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than PFL.TO's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, QQC-F.TO has outperformed PFL.TO with an annualized return of 19.30%, while PFL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.16% annualized return.


QQC-F.TO

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.53%
6M
10.95%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
19.30%

PFL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
1.26%
YTD
1.31%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
12.04%18.79%24.19%52.81%-33.42%27.15%45.04%37.63%-2.23%31.94%
PFL.TO
Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF
1.31%3.00%4.53%5.09%1.78%0.25%0.91%1.80%1.09%1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QQC-F.TO and PFL.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2014

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

PFL.TO
PFL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PFL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQC-F.TOPFL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.81

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

17.78

-16.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

58.11

-52.23

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the PFL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQC-F.TO and PFL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than PFL.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and PFL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQC-F.TOPFL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-2.07%

-33.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-0.15%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

-0.22%

-22.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-0.30%

-35.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

-2.07%

-33.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

0.00%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-0.08%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

0.05%

+3.71%

Volatility

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) at 0.22%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQC-F.TOPFL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

0.22%

+7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

0.55%

+14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

0.82%

+17.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

0.97%

+21.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

1.33%

+21.36%

Dividends

QQC-F.TO vs. PFL.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQC-F.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PFL.TO's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFL.TO
Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF
2.63%2.95%5.23%5.13%2.22%0.36%1.21%2.10%1.59%0.95%0.81%0.95%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.34%0.39%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQC-F.TO and PFL.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PFL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while PFL.TO tracks FTSE Canada Government Floating Rate Note Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and PFL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer