PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

PFL.TO (Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF) and ZSB.TO (BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds - PFL.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Government Floating Rate Note Index while ZSB.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFL.TO returned 3.13%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for ZSB.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) and BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFL.TO achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZSB.TO's 1.08% return.

PFL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.15%
YTD
1.26%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
2.15%

ZSB.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.94%
YTD
1.08%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFL.TO
Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF		1.26%3.00%4.53%5.09%1.78%0.25%0.91%1.80%1.13%
ZSB.TO
BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF		1.08%3.77%5.55%5.05%-4.09%-1.20%5.13%2.95%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PFL.TO and ZSB.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018

0.03

Over the past year, PFL.TO and ZSB.TO have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF

BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF

Often compared with PFL.TO:
PFL.TO vs. ESG.TOPFL.TO vs. XLB.TOPFL.TO vs. XSTB.TOPFL.TO vs. XFR.TOPFL.TO vs. ESGC.TOPFL.TO vs. QQC-F.TOPFL.TO vs. QQC.TO
Often compared with ZSB.TO:
ZSB.TO vs. XSB.TOZSB.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZSB.TO vs. ZAG.TOZSB.TO vs. ZST.TOZSB.TO vs. ZBBB.TOZSB.TO vs. ZCS.TOZSB.TO vs. CBIL.TO

Return for Risk

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PFL.TO
PFL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PFL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
ZSB.TO
ZSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ZSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) and BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PFL.TOZSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.26
1.56

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.65
2.17

+3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.32

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.43

2.09

+15.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.45

6.97

+49.48

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the ZSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFL.TO and ZSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFL.TO drawdown since its inception was -2.07%, smaller than the maximum ZSB.TO drawdown of -7.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFL.TO and ZSB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PFL.TOZSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-7.49%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-1.46%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.22%

-1.46%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.30%

-7.12%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.07%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.49%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.44%

-0.39%

Volatility

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF (PFL.TO) is 0.27%, while BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO) has a volatility of 0.44%. This indicates that PFL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PFL.TOZSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

0.44%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.56%

1.59%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82%

1.96%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.97%

2.77%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.33%

2.63%

-1.30%

Dividends

PFL.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

PFL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than ZSB.TO's 3.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFL.TO
Invesco Canadian Government Floating Rate Index ETF		2.63%2.95%5.23%5.13%2.22%0.36%1.21%2.10%1.59%0.95%0.81%0.95%
ZSB.TO
BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF		3.18%3.16%2.91%2.54%2.60%2.43%2.34%2.40%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PFL.TO and ZSB.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFL.TO tracks FTSE Canada Government Floating Rate Note Index, while ZSB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFL.TO and ZSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer