QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO
QQC-F.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) and ESG.TO (Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQC-F.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ESG.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQC-F.TO returned 16.33%/yr vs 16.77%/yr for ESG.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQC-F.TO achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than ESG.TO's 10.72% return.
QQC-F.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 38.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.33%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
ESG.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- —
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 19.79% | 18.41% | 24.19% | 52.81% | -33.42% | 27.15% | 46.09% |
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 10.72% | 10.99% | 33.33% | 25.19% | -14.05% | 32.71% | 19.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Communication Services
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Consumer Defensive
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Healthcare
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Industrials
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Utilities
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Basic Materials
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Energy
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Financial Services
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Real Estate
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQC-F.TO
ESG.TO
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQC-F.TO | ESG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.05 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 11.22 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQC-F.TO | ESG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.46 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.13 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.10 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than ESG.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQC-F.TO | ESG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -22.31% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.16% | -9.69% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -19.85% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.03% | -22.31% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.63% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -4.30% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.63% | +0.90% |
Volatility
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) at 3.00%. This indicates that QQC-F.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQC-F.TO | ESG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.00% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 9.36% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 12.04% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 14.98% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 16.34% | +6.20% |
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQC-F.TO vs. ESG.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQC-F.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQC-F.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 0.66% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
QQC-F.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ESG.TO is S&P 500. QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ESG.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index.
Find the right allocation for QQC-F.TO and ESG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer