QQA vs. SPIN
QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 32.22% vs 19.71% for SPIN. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
QQA vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 10.77% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 2.91% | 14.14% | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQA and SPIN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QQA and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQA vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQA
SPIN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQA
SPIN
Communication Services
QQA
SPIN
Consumer Cyclical
QQA
SPIN
Consumer Defensive
QQA
SPIN
Healthcare
QQA
SPIN
Industrials
QQA
SPIN
Utilities
QQA
SPIN
Basic Materials
QQA
SPIN
Energy
QQA
SPIN
Financial Services
QQA
SPIN
Real Estate
QQA
SPIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQA vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
QQA
SPIN
QQA vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 1.89 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 2.60 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.02 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 8.42 | +8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.89 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.95 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
QQA vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -16.85% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -9.81% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.40% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -2.29% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.35% | -0.40% |
Volatility
QQA vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.82%. This indicates that QQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQA | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 1.82% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 8.03% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 10.49% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 14.33% | +3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 14.33% | +3.94% |
QQA vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQA vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQA and SPIN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs SPIN's -16.85%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 19.71% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 19.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QQA.
QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.25% for SPIN.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQA and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer